It’s not as hard as it sounds
– honest.
It really isn’t all that
expensive, either. Especially when you take into consideration
you can take all of your files with you wherever you go, and you
can access them (in color) when you need them without ever
getting up from your chair.
I’m talking about creating a
paperless office. Yes, I’m sure that’s blasphemy to some, but
the truth is, it is one of the easiest ways to organize your
office, keep your files accessible to you wherever you travel
and practically eliminate the clutter associated with a
communicator’s workplace.
I’m going to try and be as
simplistic and nontechnical as I can be and talk in generalities
rather than specifics here, but two essential items are needed
to start the process: a computer and a scanner. I’m going to
assume you have the first item, and I’m going to tell you about
the second and some ways you can use it.
Most of us are probably already
utilizing some sort of paperless office now – if we are using
digital cameras and keeping digital photos on file on our
computers. Your written notes from interviews, legal documents,
copies of your published stories from newspapers and magazines
and materials you plan to reference at some point for another
column or article can all be scanned into your computer and
called up for future reference whenever you need them.
There are many different models of
scanners, but I suggest you purchase one with an automatic
document feeder (ADF) which allows you to scan multipage
documents without having to scan them a page at a time. Most
manufacturers have several models with ADFs and in a variety of
price ranges, usually beginning around $300. However, I have
purchased several scanners for my employer off eBay and paid as
little as $50 and as much as $250 (those prices include shipping
charges) for scanners with retail prices of $800. Not a one of
them has failed us and we saved hundreds of dollars over paying
retail – something to think about.
You will want a scanner that can
scan at 300 dpi. Look for a scanner that allows you to scan your
photo transparencies (slides and negatives). If you are getting
ready to purchase a new printer, most manufacturers have models
that print, scan, copy and fax or some combination of those four
actions.
Scanners aren’t necessarily large
– as in large footprint. They typically are about 12 inches wide
by 18 inches long and 4 to 6 inches high. They also come with
the software you’ll need to operate them, and they’re easy to
configure so that what you scan is saved to a specific folder on
your computer. That way, you can find what you scan easily and
efficiently. Obviously, you can create subfolders so that you
separate various kinds of photos from documents and so forth.
Now, if you think no one else is
doing this, call your CPA or accounting firm. (You do use one,
don’t you? If not, why not?) Because of the mounds of paper
created in an accounting office, most CPAs and accounting firms
have gone or are in the process of going paperless. They
had/have no choice. Filing cabinets take up too much space and
eventually, the office runs out of room.
While this may not be the case
with most of us, we can still get the paper off our desks and
into our computers where it is easily found and easily accessed.
You can get as detailed as you
like, but there is one cardinal rule to remember: Back up what
you scan to your computer. Saving what you scan onto a CD daily
is great; weekly is fine, too. Monthly, even quarterly works,
but whatever you do, back it up.
This is a rudimentary look at
taking your office from stacks of paper everywhere to a simple
system that allows you to scan everything into your computer. I
have lots more information about specific scanners and software
programs and will be happy to answer additional questions. Just
drop me an e-mail and I’ll shoot you some more information. I’ll
just dig it out of the files I have scanned into my computer.
Tony Dolle is director of
communications at Ducks Unlimited. His e-mail address is dolle@tds.net.
TOP
The Art of Capturing and Using Natural Audio,
Part 1
By Dan Bertalan
Outdoor television programs, video productions, radio
programs and many interactive Web sites would be as dead as last
year’s salmon run without quality, supportive natural audio. Yet
despite its vital role in almost every aspect of higher-end
outdoor media production today, it remains one of the most
overlooked and abused aspects of making outdoor media come
alive. And having a quality library of natural sounds can
sometimes separate both you and your productions from the
competition.
What’s nat
sound?
Natural audio (nat audio) is the combination of the natural
sounds that occur in an outdoor environment. It can include
ambient wind noise as moving air contacts leaves, tree branches
and a variety of surfaces. Nat audio commonly also contains bird
sounds, insect background and intermittent animal sounds such as
bugling elk or chattering squirrels. It can also include other
sounds in nature such as rushing or lapping water, thunder, rain
or even sleet.
Although some might consider all outside sounds as part of
the “natural audio” world, the true sounds of nature are more
often than not contaminated with a host of human-related sounds
that degrade its essence and production value of the audio.
Unless you’re recording in the wilds of the Yukon or the heart
of Africa, nat audio is often degraded by passing airplanes,
distant traffic, barking dogs, chain saws, gunshots, all-terrain
vehicles, watercraft, construction pounding, marching bands,
yelling kids, you name it.
More often than not, natural audio is captured
serendipitously as part of some grander enterprise such as
videotaping a television show or video production. And because
it’s “background” audio to another prominent event involving
people, it’s also “contaminated” with camera operator sounds and
talent sounds. Yes, some of those sounds are not only
unavoidable but crucial to the overall production. However,
knowing how to minimize contamination from all sources and how
to maximize the capturing of uncontaminated audio is the art of
capturing nat audio that can boost the quality of a production
and make it seamless.
Tools of the trade
Many of today’s digital cameras and recorders come with
built-in mics that are designed to capture audio – at birthday
parties with screaming kids. Most built-in mics are attached to
the housing of the camera and are extremely vulnerable to also
recording camera motor noise and camera operator-generated
noise, especially if left up to the “audio brain” of the camera.
True, some higher-end cameras have quality, cushioned mics
designed to mitigate camera noise, but again they are at the
mercy of the camera’s audio settings. To overcome some of the
challenges with gear, follow these simple cures:
·
Use a quality shotgun mic instead of the built-in mic. If
your shotgun mic has various settings, use the “normal” and not
the “tele” or high setting. You’ll capture too much white noise
and fuzzy ambience. If your camera already has a quality shotgun
style mic that is somewhat segregated from the camera body,
that’s fine. Just be sure you set it for the softer tones of
capturing nat sound.
·
Use headphones. Most audio glitches can be attributed to
not wearing headphones and assuming everything is fine with the
audio that’s being recorded. Using headphones and watching your
audio meter (if your camera has one or more) will allow you to
adjust the manual setting on the audio to capture just
the right amount of natural audio without introducing white
noise. Leaving the setting on “auto” will make the camera
boost the audio setting because it wants to hear something in
the –20db range. Most nat audio is below that range so the
camera will automatically boost the setting so high it will
introduce white noise to pick up camera noise. Yes, you’ll get
nat sound all right, but it will be awash with camera hum and
white hiss.
·
Most shotgun mics come with a foam covering intended to
muffle slight wind noise. However, the exposed foam is
susceptible to moderate to gusty wind, rain drops, sleet and
touching brush or grass. Good wind muffs abound or you can
simply use a fuzzy foot sock to slip over the mic.
OK, so now you’ve got the right gear, how do you use it
effectively?
Set the stage for quiet
Even though some camera setups take advantage of one
channel of audio devoted to the wireless audio mic of the
talent’s voice while the shotgun mic is dedicated to capture
ambient sound, a separate, clean nat sound track is crucial in
editing to make all the production cuts appear seamless using
background audio. And that requires purposefully planning and
capturing nat audio without distractions or contamination.
It’s unrealistic to hear a frog croaking during a bass
fishing segment then tell the host or talent, “Quiet on the set,
I hear a frog.” True, the frog croaking at the right times could
boost the richness of the audio track but the frog really needs
his own, “uncontaminated” time. Like any quality endeavor, plan
ahead to capture quality natural audio. In most places, this
means recording when and where human-generated noise
contamination is at a minimum. Weekdays, dawn, dusk and
remote all fit into the possible mix. This may mean getting up
early and staying up late, but you’ll soon find your quality
library of nat sounds growing by leaps and bounds. And for
loons, whippoorwills, lions, owls and such, you may even try the
middle of the night, or at least within the first hours of
darkness.
Once you’re set up in a location with some cool nat audio
occurring, minimize any camera noise by taking the shotgun mic
off the camera (if the cord permits) and secure it
(Velcro quickstrips) pointed in the direction of the best
sounds. I use a cord that lets me secure the mic about 2 feet
in front of the camera on a sapling or tree branch. Using
this technique you shouldn’t get any camera noise.
Setting on a flat rock or near flat water will allow those
surfaces to reflect the sounds into the mic.
Now set the camera down or on a tripod to minimize any cord
movement. Start recording and step back a few paces (as long as
your headphones cord permits) and sit or stand perfectly still.
I’ve heard lots of would-be attempts to capture cool nat audio
ruined by someone trying to “quietly” handhold the camera while
they swatted bugs or sniffled their nose.
Finally, let tape roll for two to three minutes per
capture. Tape’s cheap stuff compared to the rare sounds of
fighting elk or roaring lions. You might even make a shoot list
for audio capture based on the type of production you’re doing.
Here’s a simple “daily” list of possible sounds to capture for
an African production:
·
Predawn
ambience – crickets, cicada, lion roars, hyenas.
·
Dawn ambience
– soft crickets, soft doves, sand grouse chatter.
·
Morning bird
ambience – doves, oxpeckers, louder sand grouse chatter.
·
Daytime bird
ambience – various mixes.
·
Wind ambience
– slight breeze, moderate breeze, wind trees, wind grass, wind
scrub.
·
Specific
sounds – Cape buffalo grunting, elephants trumpeting, hippos
bellowing, fish eagles screaming, monkeys chattering, wildebeest
grunting.
·
Water-related
sounds – river-water rushing sounds, close and medium range.
Next to water, on riverbank.
·
Reverse the
above list from midday to dusk and after.
·
Unlike most
“natural” audio, native voices or songs – such as a Maasai
tribal dance could also be a valuable asset to add to the list.
So what’s the big deal with messing with all this nat
audio? I had a client recently give me some HD tapes of two very
intense Cape buffalo hunts that he wanted produced within an
action feature production. I was shocked to find out after I
took the job that three hours of the crucial buffalo hunting
tapes had no audio whatsoever. Fortunately, the client
was savvy about production and discovered the camera operator’s
error on location and attempted to have the talent reenact some
of the action. Then my challenge was to seamlessly assemble two,
6-minute real live-action hunting sequences using mostly footage
with no audio. The end result was a finished production with 17
hunts where even pros couldn’t pick out which ones were missing
the field audio. A few editing tricks and quality nat audio
saved the day on that job and salvaged what some producers may
have tossed on the editing room floor.
Up
next:
Part 2 – Cleaning nat audio, then making it sing in production
without stealing the show.
In the past
year alone, Dan Bertalan of greatoutdoorsmultimedia.com has used
his nat audio skills to help capture a Silver Telly Award in
outdoor production, honorable mention at the International
Wildlife Film Festival and third place in OWAA’s Big Game
Hunting TV/Video competition.
TOP
Have a tech question?
OWAA’s Technology Committee will answer it.

Practical material
Fancy is
fine but practical use is what everyone wants. Every Web site
should be easy to look at and equally easy to navigate. Clicking
on several links to get to one page isn’t worth the hassle,
putting visitors off just enough that they probably won’t stay.
When you post reading material think about where and when it can
be used and how often the information is practical. Seasonal
data are fine but less than that will keep visitors away, and
that’s not good for your business, which in many cases can be a
good source of income.
Timothy Kusherets
Disguise the commerce
One of the
main things that puts off visitors is that a site’s premise can
make it look as though the author or webmaster is looking to get
a quick buck. Visitors will “click in” and exit before reading
what you have to offer so fast that they’ll forget what your
site was about, so keep ’em there the instant they go to the
home page. Give them what they want. Think about the genre
you’re actively participating in and give them a kind of reward
for taking the time to visit your site, and make the reward the
very first thing they see. For outdoorsman, fishermen, hikers,
and marine boaters it all comes down to information that will
help them out. Think hard about what’s available and what’s not
and then post it.
Timothy Kusherets
About Web color
palettes
Web color
palette choice is critical for an effective Web page. Colors
“grab” a reader’s attention but also drive them away. Font
colors should have a high contrast with the background color for
readability. Nothing beats black letters on a white
background. Dark colors come forward and light colors recede so
make this work for you. If you do decide to use light letters on
a dark background, compensate by using a font with a heavier
footprint (weight). Avoid pairing large areas of intense colors,
they fatigue eyes. But if you do decide to use them, be stingy.
A little goes a long way. Look for photos in your library with
colors you like and use the eyedropper tool on your photo
software to identify the colors. This can be the beginnings of
your own Web color palette. Don't use too many colors. A dark,
medium and light color with a few variations and a small amount
of accent color creates a color-rich Web site. For more tips &
tricks:
www.knorrpage.de/colormatch.html. Pick a color you like and
this site gives you a six-color Web palette.
www.colorsontheweb.com/colorsontheweb.asp. Web-safe
colors, HTML colors and color theory.
http://wellstyled.com/tools/colorscheme2/index-en.html.
Color palette generator – be careful with some of these
palettes!
http://kuler.adobe.com. Great color palettes and palette
creation tool. (Needs Flash 9.)
www.colormatters.com/computers.html. How computers create
color and why colors are perceived differently. Discusses how
Web color choice affects people, emotions, symbolism. You will
think differently about color after viewing this site.
Diane and Jim Low
TOP
Questions/Comments:
Let the editor know what you think of OWAA’s Tech-E-Letter.
Editorial
Guidelines for OWAA’s Tech-E-Letter: OWAA welcomes your
submissions of features
(500 words or fewer), tips (150 words or fewer) and emerging
news (50 words or fewer).
E-mail your articles or story ideas to Tech-E-Letter Editor
Sarah Prodell.
Technology
Committee:
Chair:
Bob Knopf
Vice Chair:
Les Booth
Members:
Katie McKalip,
Tony Dolle,
Mike Walker,
John Beath,
Dan Bertalan,
Doug Wilson,
Dan Small,
Bill AuCoin,
Mike Furtman,
Tony Dean,
Jim Foster,
Larry Larsen,
Timothy Kusherets,
Scott Richmond. Ex
officio: Diane
Low, Rich Patterson
and Kevin Rhoades.
OWAA Staff:
Executive Director, Kevin Rhoades
Tech-E-Letter, OU
Editor,
Sarah Prodell
Membership and
Conference Services, Robin
Giner
Intern, Elizabeth Harrison
Interested in becoming a member of OWAA?
OWAA HOME
SITE INDEX
CONTACT US
JOIN US
TOP
